VI. Alleged violation of Article 6 of the Convention
99. In their initial application form the applicants stated that they had been deprived of access to a court, contrary to the provisions of Article 6 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
"In the determination of his civil rights and obligations..., everyone is entitled to a fair... hearing... by [a]... tribunal..."
100. In the observations on admissibility and merits of 14 November 2006 the applicants stated that they no longer maintained their complaint under Articles 6.
101. The Court, having regard to Article 37 of the Convention, finds that the applicants do not intend to pursue this part of the application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a). The Court also finds no reasons of a general character, affecting respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention, which require the further examination of the present complaints by virtue of Article 37 § 1 of the Convention in fine (see Stamatios Karagiannis v. Greece, No. 27806/02, § 28, 10 February 2005).
102. It follows that this part of the application must be struck out in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.